Articles
Key Points on Denial of Entry of Indonesian Preacher to Singapore
Topic
Defence and security
Foreign policy
Subtopic
Multiculturalism
National security
Total Defence
24 May 2022
Entry to Singapore is neither automatic nor a right. Each case is assessed on its own merits. We take a serious view of any persons who advocate violence and/or espouse extremist and segregationist teachings.
Overview
Somad was denied entry due to his history of extremist and segregationist teachings, which are unacceptable in Singapore’s multiracial and multi-religious society.
Entry to Singapore is neither automatic nor a right. Each case is assessed on its own merits. We take a serious view of any persons who advocate violence and/or espouse extremist and segregationist teachings.
Key Points
On 16 May, Indonesia preacher Abdul Somad Batubara (Somad) arrived at Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal with six others. Somad was interviewed, and the group was denied entry and sent back to Batam. Somad then claimed on Instagram (6.5 million followers) and YouTube (2.71 million subscribers) that he had been “deported” by Singapore.
MHA has clarified that Somad was denied entry due to his history of extremist and segregationist teachings, which are unacceptable in Singapore’s multiracial and multi-religious society. For example:
Support for use of violence. In 2017, Somad claimed that suicide bombings are legitimate in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, and that Palestinian suicide bombers were martyrs.
Segregationist remarks. In 2017, Somad said that Muslims should vote for, and accept only Muslim leaders, as non-Muslims are “kafirs” (infidels).
Inflammatory remarks towards other religions. In 2019, Somad described the Christian crucifix as the dwelling place of an “infidel jinn” (spirit / devil).
Somad’s teachings have had real consequences: in Jan 2020, the Internal Security Act (ISA) detained a 17-year-old boy who had been radicalised. He watched Somad’s YouTube’s lectures on suicide bombings and began to believe suicide bombers are martyrs.
In a YouTube video on 18 May, Somad said that he would not give up going to Singapore, as it is Malay land (tanah melayu), and that the Riau people see Singapore as part of their land, because Singapore was part of the “Temasek Malay kingdom”. This implied that Singapore’s sovereignty is irrelevant, and that from his perspective, Singapore is not a separate country.
In the days after Somad’s denied entry to Singapore, his supporters rallied around him and criticised the Singapore government. There were calls for cyber-attacks against the Singapore government, for Singapore to be bombed, and for Singapore to be attacked like the 9/11 incident in New York . Social media accounts of some Singapore political office holders and government agencies were spammed, and two events management companies had their website defaced. On 20 May, Somad’s supporters staged demonstrations outside the Singapore Embassy in Jakarta and the Singapore Consulate-General in Medan. In Medan, some protestors carried signs with message such as “boycott Singapore products” and “expel Singapore ambassador”.
Indonesia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman said that Indonesia acknowledges the sovereignty of every country to implement its immigration rules and exercise its rights to accept or deny entry to foreigners.
This is not the first time Singapore has denied entry of and/or removed individuals who had sought to promote divisive or intolerant views along religious lines. For example, in 2017, two Christian preachers were banned from preaching in Singapore after they made derogatory comments towards Islam and Buddhism. Entry to Singapore is neither automatic nor a right. The Singapore government takes a serious view of any persons who advocate violence and/or espouse extremist and segregationist teachings. Moreover, Singapore is not the first jurisdiction to deny entry to Somad − he had also been denied entry to areas including Hong Kong, Timor Leste, and the United Kingdom.